Connect with us


US election 2020: When will we get a result for the US election?




A mail carrier of the United States Postal Service delivers mail in Washington, DC, USA, 18 August 2020Image copyright

Twenty years have passed since Americans woke up on an autumn morning after Election Day and did not know who would next lead the country.

It took 36 more days to resolve the contest between Al Gore and George W Bush as the country held its breath.

That prospect could happen again in 2020.


Well, the pandemic has many people fearful of voting in person because in the US that often means waiting for hours in a queue.

So millions more will vote by post and there are fears it could take days or weeks to count them all, leaving the outcome on a knife-edge.

What usually happens on a normal election night?

Different states stop voting at different times.

The first polls to close are on the East Coast, at about 1900 ET (midnight GMT), and after that you start getting a running total as votes in those states are counted.

Presidents are not picked by winning a national vote. No, instead it’s a series of state-wide races with the winner in each state taking a certain number of what’s called electoral college votes.

A state is “called” for a candidate when a media outlet believes one candidate has an insurmountable lead. It is a projection not a final result.

Similarly, when the whole election is “called” for a candidate, it is not the official result because there are still lots of votes to count.

An election is usually called on the night. And what follows is a choreographed response including a concession speech from the losing candidate. Perhaps not this year – more on that later.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Media captionThe president of the United States is not chosen directly by voters, but by what’s known as the electoral college

In 2016 the election was called for Donald Trump at about 0230 EST (0730 GMT) after winning Wisconsin put him over the 270 threshold of electoral college votes.

In the days and weeks that followed, more and more Democratic votes were counted which meant Hillary Clinton stretched her lead in the popular votes but the electoral college was already lost.

An unprecedented volume of postal ballots

Standing in a queue at a polling station on Election Day is the most common way American voters cast ballots, but in recent years, voting by mail has risen in popularity.

Whereas it was previously not uncommon for states to restrict voting by post to special circumstances – such as being a soldier who was serving abroad – now the practice is widely permitted in a majority of states, whether one is an “absentee voter” or for any other reason.

In 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic has prompted an unprecedented number of requests from voters to cast ballots by post.

Some 80 million mail-in ballots are predicted to be cast – double the number in 2016 and more than any other election year.

The concern, then, is whether that volume of ballot deliveries will delay everything.

That fear is not just due to the large volume of ballots to count.

It is also due to the US Postal Service undergoing cutbacks at a time when it has a big responsibility.

First it has to post ballot papers out to people, and then it has to send them back again to election authorities, all before deadlines set by the states.

How are postal votes counted?

States have wide latitude over determining election rules, including setting deadlines for a postal vote to qualify.

Pennsylvania will only include those received by 20:00 local time on Election Day, while California accepts votes as long as they are postmarked by the date, even if they arrive weeks later. That’s why counting in the huge West Coast state always takes a long time.

Image copyright

Image caption

There have been concerns over whether the postal service has the capacity to handle the electoral mail

Postal ballot counting takes longer because each vote must have a signature that is matched with a separate autograph on a registration card.

With double the number of postal ballots expected, that process alone will add time to the count.

Some states like Florida will begin processing the postal votes before Election Day, like verifying signatures, and start actually counting them on the morning of the election.

But most states and Washington DC do not start counting them until all the in-person voting is over and polls have closed.

The National Conference of State Legislatures has a full list of when each state counts postal votes.

What about in-person voting? Will that take longer?

The 2020 primary elections also gave voters a preview of problems that could mar in-person voting on Election Day. States from New York to Alaska struggled with running this traditional and still most common method of casting ballots.

This year, perennial issues like faulty voting machines were compounded by worker shortages and longer than usual queues due to social distancing concerns.

These led to changes that protracted the process.

Kentucky sharply cut the number of polling stations and had to order polls to stay open longer, so people in lower-income areas had to travel much further to cast a vote.

That was hugely controversial, sparking accusations that the pandemic was being used as a way to suppress minority votes.

Alaska forced all voters in some areas to use postal ballots because no polling station could be opened and Georgia was faced with lawsuits over malfunctioning polling machines.

How one key state is preparing for the avalanche of postal votes

By Laura Trevelyan, North Carolina

New Hanover County in Wilmington is the quintessential swing district in a battleground state. And the election is under way here.

Scenic and affluent, it hasn’t voted for a Democratic President since Jimmy Carter. Barack Obama came cl

Official feed of BBC News, The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is a British public service broadcaster. Headquartered at Broadcasting House in Westminster, London, it is the world's oldest national broadcaster, and the largest broadcaster in the world by number of employees.

Continue Reading
Click to comment


Amy Coney Barrett: Trump nominates conservative favourite for Supreme Court





US President Donald Trump introduces Amy Coney Barrett as his nominee to the Supreme CourtImage copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

If confirmed by the Senate, Judge Barrett would be the third Supreme Court justice appointed by President Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett, a favourite of social conservatives, to be the new Supreme Court justice.

Speaking at the White House Rose Garden, Mr Trump described her as a “woman of unparalleled achievement”.

Judge Barrett would replace liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died of cancer on 18 September.

Her nomination will spark a bitter Senate fight to get her confirmed as November’s presidential election looms.

Supreme Court justices are nominated by the US president, but must be approved by the Senate.

Mr Trump said Judge Barrett was a “stellar scholar and judge” with “unyielding loyalty to the constitution”.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Media captionAmy Coney Barrett “is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials”, the US president says

If Judge Barrett is confirmed, conservative-leaning justices will hold a 6-3 majority on the US’s highest court for the foreseeable future.

The 48-year-old would be the third justice appointed by this Republican president, after Neil Gorsuch in 2017 and Brett Kavanaugh in 2018.

The Supreme Court’s nine justices serve lifetime appointments, and their rulings can shape public policy on everything from gun and voting rights to abortion and campaign finance long after the presidents who appoint them leave office.

In recent years, the court has expanded gay marriage to all 50 states, allowed for Mr Trump’s travel ban on mainly Muslim countries to be put in place, and delayed a US plan to cut carbon emissions.

Tricky position for Democrats

Amy Coney Barrett has been on Donald Trump’s shortlist for Supreme Court vacancies for some time, but the word was that she would be the most appropriate replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

As of last week, that was no longer a hypothetical scenario.

Even before Mr Trump reportedly settled on Judge Barrett as his pick, conservatives were rallying around the nominee, whoever it might be. And if they stick together, as all but two seem to be doing, her confirmation appears assured – whether it is before November’s election or in a “lame duck” Senate session afterward.

The choice of Judge Barrett puts Democrats in a tricky position. They have to find a way of undermining support for the nominee without seeming to attack her Catholic faith or personal background – moves that could risk turning off some voters in November. They will seek to delay the proceedings as best they can, while keeping their focus on issues like healthcare and abortion, which could be at the centre of future legal battles with Justice Barrett on a conservative-dominated court.

Then they have to hope Judge Barrett, or the Republicans, make some kind of critical error. It is a tall order, but for the moment it is the only play they have.

Who is Amy Coney Barrett?

She is described as a devout Catholic who, according to a 2013 magazine article, said that “life begins at conception”. This makes her a favourite among religious conservatives keen to overturn the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalised abortion nationwide.

Her links to a particularly conservative Christian faith group, People of Praise, have been much discussed in the US press. LGBT groups have pointed out that the group’s network of schools have guidelines stating a belief that sexual relations should only happen between heterosexual married couples.

One such group, Human Rights Campaign, has voiced strong opposition to Judge Barrett’s confirmation, declaring her an “absolute threat to LGBTQ rights“.

Judge Barrett has also ruled in favour of President Trump’s hardline immigration policies and expressed views in favour of expansive gun rights.

Image copyright

Image caption

Judge Barrett clerked for the late Justice Antonin Scalia

Conservatives hope she will help to invalidate Obamacare, the health insurance programme that was introduced by President Trump’s democratic predecessor, Barack Obama.

Some 20 million Americans could lose their health coverage if the court overturns the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Democrats have rallied support over this issue, but it is thought unlikely that the Supreme Court w

Continue Reading


Amy Coney Barrett: Who is Trump’s Supreme Court pick?





Judge Amy Coney Barrett poses in an undated photograph obtained from Notre Dame UniversityImage copyright

Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the US Supreme Court comes as little surprise.

The long-term academic, appeals court judge and mother of seven was the hot favourite for the Supreme Court seat.

Donald Trump – who as sitting president gets to select nominees – reportedly once said he was “saving her” for this moment: when elderly Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and a vacancy on the nine-member court arose.

It took the president just over a week to fast-track the 48-year-old conservative intellectual into the wings. This is his chance to tip the court make-up even further to the right ahead of the presidential election, when he could lose power.

Barrett’s record on gun rights and immigration cases imply she would be as reliable a vote on the right of the court, as Ginsburg was on the left, according to Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University.

“Ginsburg maintained one of the most consistent liberal voting records in the history of the court. Barrett has the same consistency and commitment,” he adds. “She is not a work-in-progress like some nominees. She is the ultimate ‘deliverable’ for conservative votes.”

And her vote, alongside a conservative majority, could make the difference for decades ahead, especially on divisive issues such as abortion rights and the Affordable Care Act (the Obama-era health insurance provider).

Barrett’s legal opinions and remarks on abortion and gay marriage have made her popular with the religious right, but earned vehement opposition from liberals.

But as a devout Catholic, she has repeatedly insisted her faith does not compromise her work.

Barrett lives in South Bend, Indiana, with her husband, Jesse, a former federal prosecutor who is now with a private firm. The couple have seven children, including two adopted from Haiti. She is the oldest of seven children herself.

Known for her sharp intellect, she studied at the University of Notre Dame’s Law School, graduating first in her class, and was a clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, who, in her words, was the “staunchest conservative” on the Supreme Court at the time.

Image copyright

Image caption

A Hall of Fame photograph of Amy Coney Barrett (left) hanging in Rhodes College, Tennessee, where she got her undergraduate degree

Like her mentor Scalia, she is an originalist, which is a belief that judges should attempt to interpret the words of the Constitution as the authors intended when they were written.

Many liberals oppose that strict approach, saying there must be scope for moving with the times.

Battle over Supreme Court

Image copyright
Getty Images

Barrett has spent much of her career as a professor at her alma mater, Notre Dame, where she was voted professor of the year multiple times. One of students, Deion Kathawa, who took a class with her earlier this year, told the BBC she was popular because she involved everyone in discussions. He found her “collegial, civil, fair-minded, intellectually sharp, and devoted to the rule of law secured by our Constitution”.

Another student told the WBEZ new site: “I feel somewhat conflicted because … she’s a great professor. She never brought up politics in her classroom… But I do not agree with her ideologies at all. I don’t think she would be good for this country and the Supreme Court.”

Image copyright

Image caption

Barrett has continued to teach at Notre Dame Law School

Barrett was selected by President Trump to serve as a federal appeals court judge in 2017, sitting on the Seventh Cir

Continue Reading


Megan Thee Stallion: What do we know about the rapper’s alleged shooting?





Megan Thee Stallion and Tory LanezImage copyright
Getty Images

Rappers Megan Thee Stallion and Tory Lanez are back in the news, after Tory denied shooting Megan in the feet in one of his new songs.

The case has led to several high-profile rows in the US music industry.

It has also sparked a debate about perceptions of gender-based violence against black women, and concerns within the African American community about police brutality.

Authorities in Los Angeles say investigations are ongoing.

How did this begin?

During the early hours of 12 July, police responded to a “shots fired” incident in the Hollywood Hills, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) said in a statement.

An argument is reported to have taken place inside a vehicle, with shots fired into the air, before the vehicle left the scene.

The LAPD said officers then conducted a “traffic stop” on a vehicle matching a description provided by eyewitnesses, and “multiple individuals were detained”.

Tory Lanez, 28, whose real name is Daystar Peterson, was charged with carrying a concealed weapon and released on bail later that morning.

In a statement on 15 July, Los Angeles police said another person was brought to hospital and received treatment for an unspecified “foot injury”.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Megan Thee Stallion alleges she was shot while walking away from Tory Lanez

Megan Thee Stallion – whose real name is Megan Pete – alleged that four people were in the car at the time: herself, a friend, Mr Peterson, and his bodyguard.

Initially, TMZ reported that Ms Pete had cut her foot from broken glass in the car. But on 15 July, she released a statement saying she had suffered “multiple gunshot wounds… done with the intention to physically harm me.”

Several days later, in an Instagram post, Ms Pete shared graphic images of the stitches in her heel, and of doctors attending to her foot.

On 20 August, for the first time, she named Mr Peterson as the alleged shooter while speaking in a video on Instagram Live. She said when police found her, she did not tell them what had allegedly happened because she feared they would start shooting if they believed a gun was involved.

“I didn’t tell the police nothing, because I didn’t want us to get in no more trouble than we was about to get in,” she said, denying that she had physically assaulted Mr Peterson.

The Los Angeles County district attorney’s office has said it is reviewing another charge against Mr Peterson over the alleged shooting. A spokesperson told the Los Angeles Times that a decision would be make after further investigation by law en

Continue Reading

Trending Facebook

You May Like

Black Lives Matter


Enable Notifications    Ok No thanks